Maoist organisation plagued by corruption, exploitation
* Frustrated by these and other ‘unlike party’ trends, some senior leaders
and cadres in CPI (Maoist) have been breaking away from the
organisation
By Kartik Lokhande
UNDATED, Feb 2: Power struggle and
differences have intensified within CPI (Maoist) organisation over
several issues. Frustrated with the differences and ‘suppression’ by
Telugu leaders and cadres, many Maoists are breaking away or leaving or
surrendering before police in the recent past.
Though not many are coming out openly on issues that led to their
decision, a senior cadre Sabyasachi Panda had spelled out those in his
detailed letter to Maoist top brass in late 2012. Initially, the Maoist
leadership reacted to the letter and specific observations made in it as
an attempt to malign the party. However, in its latest meeting, Central
Committee of CPI (Maoist) has admitted to ‘damage’ caused by ‘renegade’
Panda’s letter. What did ‘that’ letter contain?
There were a lot many shocking observations made by an insider like
Panda, who now heads break-away faction Odisha Maobadi Party (OMP)
active in some parts of Odisha. Panda had written two letters to CPI
(Maoist) General Secretary Muppalla Laxmana Rao alias Ganapathy
(referred to as GS), Politburo members Prashant Bose alias Sumit Dada,
Narayan Sanyal alias Vijay Dada. In the letters, Sabyasachi Panda had
quoted several instances to drive home his point that CPI (Maoist) ‘did
not represent the true people’s democracy’. He had dubbed the theory of
annihilation as ‘ugly’ and had raised several questions whether the
Maoist leaders had any alternative policies on industrial development,
agricultural, medical, educational aspects. He did not mince words
condemning the stand taken by some Central Committee members including
Nambala Keshava Rao alias Basavraj, Manoj, Bhaskar and others on various
issues.
It was Panda who first gave voice to discontent brewing in Maoist rank
and file due to ‘autocratic functioning’ of leaders, exploitation of
women, financial corruption, lies during various operations to frame
some members who disapproved of ‘deviation’ from goals of the movement,
problems with unity, illicit sexual relations etc.
“Leaders are thinking of them as masters and cadres have no courage to
oppose the leader’s mistakes. Voting on only two-three opinions, which
are coming from leaders mainly, in conference/congress does not reflect
the real democracy. You are not for true people’s democracy. You want an
autocratic system in the name of proletarian dictatorships. Even
innocent people are killed sometimes for revolution,” observed Panda. He
pointed out ‘problems’ in unity of the party as the Telugu leaders
dominated the decision-making and often ‘imposed’ their decisions.
People’s War (PW) and Maoist Communist Centre of India (MCCI), which
came together to form CPI (Maoist) in 2004, ‘were engaged in quarrel’ as
the merger had taken place ‘hastily’, he added.
Within the organisation, elevation of cadres was based on favouritism,
Panda had revealed. Mincing no words, he had commented, “Gun-holding
commanders are not tolerating the local tribal people’s assertion. Only
‘yes men’ and good boys/girls of leaders are promoted. Telugu leaders
and cadres have their separate meetings and impose their ideas on other
cadres.” In fact, Telugu members commented on food habits of non-Telugu
cadres and it had become a point of quarrel between ‘local and non-local
cadres’ in everyday life in jungle.
The Maoists, who claim to fight against exploitation, themselves resort
to exploitation of cadres. Panda’s letter highlights ‘how’ and ‘when’.
Quoting an incident, he pointed out that the party had arrested three
women squad members who wanted to go home during a Christian festival.
He quoted Central Committee member Manoj as saying that ‘all these are
needed for revolution and if needed one member and leader can be
killed’. Similarly, Panda quoted another incident in which a party
member Ramesh was madly in love with a girl in the squad, but the
leaders separated them and tortured Ramesh. In fact, some senior members
wanted to eliminate Ramesh.
Published in The Hitavada all edition on February 3, 2014 |
Comments
Post a Comment