By Kartik Lokhande
For
a common man, it will be very difficult to believe that any region
facing agrarian crisis and witnessing farmers’ suicides, is at the
centre of an international corporate aggression. For, some say that the
farmers’ suicides, or, for that matter, agrarian crisis is a result of
failure of biotechnology (Bt) or genetically modified (GM) crop. Others
counter it by putting the blame on to rampant use of chemical
fertilizers. While this war of words, allegations and
counter-allegations, goes on, the farmers who are caught in the crisis
have a very little say. For, they have not been given freedom to
exercise their choice in the so-called free market.
Here, the point
is the ongoing debate – whether to allow GM crops/Bt crops or not. And,
nationally and internationally, the opinion is divided. India has
allowed commercial release of only one Bt crop – cotton. And, the entire
debate over good or bad results of Bt/GM crops is centred around
cotton. Those in favour claim that it has led to tremendous increase in
cotton yield, thus benefitting farmers. Further, the supporters claim,
Bt cotton has reduced pesticide or fertilizer cost of farmers. On the
other hand, the opponents, popularly called as ‘anti-GM’, claim that Bt
cotton foliage has caused harm to cattle and human health as well. Both
sides have been quoting one research or another to buttress their
claims. More interestingly, each side has been presenting a farmer or
another as its ‘poster boy’ of beneficiary or victim of Bt cotton.
Have
the farmers benefited from Bt cotton? To an extent, yes. To an extent,
no. This is where the war between pro-GM and anti-GM intensifies.
Factually speaking, more than 95 per cent of the cotton area in India
has come under Bt cotton. There are countless many brands of Bt cotton
in India. Does this indicate that farmers have accepted Bt cotton? The
factual answer will be a no. Many farmers who saw increase in yield in
initial seasons after sowing Bt cotton, later saw a decline in yield. In
many cases, cotton plant attracted diseases and yield came down. As a
result, they wanted to revert to traditional or desi varieties of
cotton. However, only Bt cotton seeds were available in the market.
Cotton-growers had no option but to continue with Bt cotton.
Thus,
blocking one option to promote another has left farmers in a lurch. In a
country like India, the Government is ‘the’ authority. However, in case
of GM crops, the Government has not been able to take any stand.
Instead of conducting proper scientific research on merits or demerits
of GM crops, and placing it in public domain for scrutiny, the erstwhile
UPA Government had imposed a moratorium on field trials of GM crops, in
particular, Bt Brinjal. This led to slowing down of research even by
private entities. While many scientists in the Government set-up
advocated GM crops, the Parliamentary committee gave its verdict against
it. The contradictions led nowhere. In the gap left by these
contradictions, experts fear, many illegal GM crop varieties might be in
the market already.
Recently, the new Government at the Centre has
shown some initiative to iron out the contradictions within the set-up.
It has allowed field trials to be conducted, opening the doors to
research and scientific data collection. But, the Government needs to
take one more step further and put in place a regulatory mechanism that
prevents multinational corporations from blocking other options
available to farmers. In fact, the Government should ask the companies
to invest in research that will support the traditional wisdom of
sustainable agricultural practices, and organic farming. The Government
should also ensure that all alternatives are available to farmers, and
they are allowed to exercise their own choice.
If a technology helps
a farmer in a particular area with specific agro-climatic conditions,
he will surely go for it. If it does not, he will reject it. For that to
happen, the pre-requisite is the availability of all technologies,
varieties, options in the market.
(03-12-14)
Comments
Post a Comment